Management thinker Peter F. Drucker (1909–2005) first posed the timeless question, “Are we doing things right, or are we doing the right things?” –  a challenge that continues to resonate in today’s Philippine governance and institutional landscape.
(Photo courtesy of Drucker Archives, Claremont Graduate University)

 

What Philippine leaders can learn from Peter Drucker about management and leadership

Peter F. Drucker, often called the father of modern management, was an Austrian-born thinker who transformed how the world understood leadership. Born in Vienna in 1909, Drucker fled Nazi Europe and settled in the United States in 1937. He taught at New York University for more than two decades and later at Claremont Graduate University in California. Through landmark books such as “The Practice of Management” (1954) and “Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices” (1973), he redefined leadership as a moral responsibility rather than a position of power.

Among his most enduring insights is this:

“Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.”

The line captures the difference between efficiency and purpose. For countries like the Philippines, the warning is clear: no amount of process or paperwork can replace clarity of direction.

Relevance in the Philippine context

In the Philippines today, government offices are preoccupied with projects, fund releases, and a steady stream of press conferences meant to signal progress. Yet citizens still face the same frustrations. Flood-control projects collapse after the first typhoon. Commuters wait in long lines despite endless modernization plans. Anti-corruption drives begin, fade, and return under new names.

This is what Drucker meant by “doing things right” without “doing the right things.” The machinery of government works, but too often in the wrong direction. Leadership must first define what truly serves the people. Only then can management carry it out with competence and integrity.

The ladder and the wall

American author Stephen Covey later illustrated Drucker’s idea with a simple image:

“Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of success; leadership determines whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall.”

Imagine people climbing fast and skillfully, but the ladder rests on the wrong wall. No matter how hard they climb, they still end up in the wrong place.

That is what happens when governments value spending speed over impact or publicity over results. Leadership must choose the right wall, and management must then climb it carefully and well.

Tie budgets to outcomes

Public officials often measure success by how much of a budget was spent rather than by what was achieved. Drucker would call that the wrong scoreboard. True management links money to measurable results.

Every peso should be tied to an outcome that citizens can verify: fewer flooded streets, faster commutes, safer hospitals, cleaner water. Leadership must define these goals before a single peso is released. Management must then ensure that independent audits confirm them.

The International Budget Partnership’s 2023 Open Budget Survey gave the Philippines a transparency score of 75 out of 100, showing strong public access to budget data but weak citizen participation at 33 out of 100. The government releases information, but the public still struggles to confirm whether the funds actually make a difference.

Open data for trust

Drucker believed that information, not authority, is the foundation of good decisions. In today’s digital age, that means open data.

The Philippine government has taken visible steps toward transparency through the PhilGEPS (Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System), an online portal created under Republic Act No. 9184 as the central source of procurement information. The site publishes bid notices, contract awards, and supplier details from national and local agencies.

Yet independent reviews, including those by the Open Government Partnership, the Open Knowledge Foundation, and the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) framework, find that much of the data remains technical, incomplete, or not fully machine-readable. Implementation records, post-award performance reports, and full lifecycle tracking are still missing for many agencies. This limits public monitoring and weakens accountability.

Leadership should make information simple, searchable, and complete. Citizens, journalists, and academics must be able to see who received contracts, how much was paid, and whether projects were finished. Transparency is not decoration; it is the oxygen of accountability.

Protect those who tell the truth

Drucker taught that organizations thrive when people can question authority. “The most serious mistakes,” he said, “are not made as a result of wrong answers. The truly dangerous thing is asking the wrong questions.”

Whistleblowers, auditors, and front-liners who raise red flags should be protected, not punished. Philippine history shows what happens when they are silenced: truth disappears, and wrongdoing thrives. Leadership must make honesty a safe and rewarded act.

Close the loop and learn from crises

Every major scandal, project failure, or disaster should end with reform. After each crisis, the public deserves to know what changed. Did new rules fix the problem? Were penalties enforced? Did oversight improve?

Drucker’s advice still applies: “Follow effective action with quiet reflection. From the reflection will come even more effective action.” The country’s new Government Procurement Reform updates and open-contracting standards are encouraging, but reforms must continue until learning becomes second nature. Mistakes paid for by taxpayers should yield lessons, not repetition.

The real measure of leadership

If Peter Drucker were to look at the Philippines today, he might ask:

  1. Have we chosen the right goals before acting?
  2. Do we measure results that improve citizens’ lives?
  3. Do we protect those who tell the truth?
  4. Do we learn from failure?

Only a government that can answer “yes” to all four is truly led, not merely managed.

The wall that matters

Management keeps the system running. Leadership sets the destination. The Philippines can continue doing things right, processing paperwork, releasing budgets, and forming committees, but until it publicly agrees on the right things to do, it will keep climbing efficiently toward the wrong goal.

The nation needs leaders who choose the right wall and managers who climb it with integrity. Progress will not come from activity alone but from direction grounded in ethics and courage.

As Peter Drucker reminded the world, effectiveness without principle is confusion, and efficiency without purpose is waste. His principles remain a valuable guide to both business and public institutions worldwide, pointing toward a kind of performance rooted not only in results, but in ethics, accountability, and service.

Only when the Philippines embraces that truth will its ladder finally reach the wall that matters, the one built on trust, competence, and the common good.

One thought on “Doing things right vs doing the right things

Comments are closed.

Back To Top