WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court concluded its 2024–2025 term on Friday, June 27, issuing rulings on five major cases before entering its annual summer recess. While its decision to limit nationwide injunctions in immigration lawsuits drew the most attention Supreme Court limits broad rulings against Trump policies, sidesteps birthright citizenship issue the justices also weighed in on several other significant matters involving parental rights, internet regulation, and federal oversight.
- LGBTQ+ Opt-Out in Schools: In Mahmoud v. Taylor, the Court ruled 6–3 that public schools must allow parents to opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed storybooks when the content conflicts with their religious beliefs. The majority held that the First Amendment protects families from state-imposed burdens on religious upbringing.
- Age Verification for Adult Sites: In Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the Court upheld a Texas law requiring age verification for users accessing pornography websites. The 6–3 decision found that the law serves a compelling state interest in protecting minors without unconstitutionally restricting adult speech.
- FCC Broadband Fee Upheld: In Consumers’ Research v. FCC, the justices ruled 6–3 to affirm the legality of the Universal Service Fund, which collects fees from telecom providers to expand broadband and phone access in rural and low-income areas. The Court rejected arguments that the program violated the Constitution’s nondelegation doctrine.
- Health Task Force Appointments Validated: In a unanimous decision in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc., the Court upheld the appointment process for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, finding it compliant with the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. The task force’s recommendations influence insurance coverage of preventive health services under federal law.
With these rulings, the Court adjourns for the summer. The justices will resume oral arguments and regular proceedings at the start of the next term on Monday, October 6, 2025. While in recess, the Court may still handle emergency applications and administrative matters as needed.
