Dear Atty. Gurfinkel:
I am out of status, but my employer filed a labor certification for me in 2010. The Department of Labor has already certified my labor certification, and the USCIS has approved my employer’s I-140 petition. The priority date on my case is now current, and I want to file for adjustment of status and get work authorization right away, but I am being told I still must “wait” for an amnesty.
Why can’t I file for adjustment now, since my priority is already current?
Very truly yours,
T.P.
Dear T.P.:
With the rapid movement of priority dates, many people who were petitioned by employers now have “current” priority dates. For October 2014, visas are available for workers with priority dates earlier than October 1, 2011- a mere 3-year backlog (compared to the past, where the wait was many more years). However, even if a person has an approved case and a current priority date, they must still be eligible to adjust status. Generally, in order for a person to be eligible to file for adjustment of status (obtain a green card in the US), the person:
• must be in status;
• is being petitioned as an “immediate relative” of a US citizen (spouse, parent, minor child); or
• Has the benefit of Section 245(i), if the person is out of status, worked without authorization, entered as a crewman, or entered without inspection (EWI).
In your case, you are out of status and are not being petitioned as an immediate relative. Therefore, for you to file for adjustment of status based on your employer’s petition, you would need to have the benefit of (or eligible under) one of the two versions of Section 245(i), which expired on April 30, 2001:
FIRST VERSION OF SECTION 245(i):
-The person was petitioned by either an employer or a family member on or before January 14, 1998.
SECOND VERSION OF SECTION 245(i):
-The person was petitioned either by an employer or a family member between January 15, 1998 and April 30, 2001; and
-The person was “physically present” in the US on December 21, 2000, which was when Section 245(i) was signed into law. (The first version of Section 245(i) does not require the person to be physically present in the US on any particular date. It requires only that he or she was petitioned on or before January 14, 1998.)
Also, if a person secured Section 245(i) through a pre-April 2001 filing, they are considered “grandfathered,” and can be petitioned by a different petition or petitioner AFTER April 2001, and transfer their 245(i) eligibility to the new filing. For example, their sister petitioned them in 2000, and in 2010, an employer files a labor certification. The 245(i) from the sister’s case can be utilized for the 2010 case.
Since your employer’s case was filed in 2010, you do not have the benefit of Section 245(i) based on that case. If you file for adjustment of status (because your priority date is current), the USCIS will deny adjustment because you are not eligible, in that you are out of status and do not have the benefit of Section 245(i).
I know of many TNT’s who were not aware of this law and thought that because their priority date was current, they can go ahead and file for adjustment, even though their case had been filed after April 30, 2001. Sure enough, adjustment was denied. This is the case whether they were petitioned by an employer or through a family-based petition (other than one as an immediate relative).
If you are under petition (by an employer or family member) and have a current priority date, but are out of status, seek the advice and guidance of an attorney, who can evaluate your situation and determine if there are other options for you, notwithstanding your being out of status. However, don’t just file for adjustment, without being sure, as you will lose your filing fees, and alert USCIS.
* * *
Michael J. Gurfinkel is licensed, and an active member of the State Bar of California and New York. All immigration services are provided by, or under the supervision of, an active member of the State Bar of California. Each case is different. The information contained herein including testimonials, “Success Stories,” endorsements and re-enactments) is of a general nature, and is not intended to apply to any particular case, and does not constitute a prediction, warranty, guarantee or legal advice regarding the outcome of your legal matter. No attorney-client relationship is, or shall be, established with any reader.
WEBSITE: www.gurfinkel.com
Call Toll free to schedule a consultation for anywhere in the US:
(866)—GURFINKEL
Four offices to serve you: LOS ANGELES · SAN FRANCISCO · NEW YORK · PHILIPPINES
