Can employees challenge employment documents they signed?

WE previously discussed the question of whether an employee’s signature to an independent contractor (IC) agreement binds the employee to the terms of that agreement. We noted that the law determines the worker’s status, not the parties’ agreement.  Even if there was an IC agreement, workers who are treated as employees will not be bound by its terms.
Signed agreements, therefore, in some situations, cannot be enforced against employees. Another scenario may exist in the area of wages. Consider the situation of Carlos Arechiga.
When Carlos Arechiga started working as a janitor for Dolores Press, Inc., he and his employer orally agreed he would work 11 hours a day, six days a week, for a total of 66 hours per week. As a nonexempt employee, his work schedule entitled him to 26 hours of overtime pay each week. By agreement, Dolores Press paid him $880 per week. This agreement was later put in writing.
Arechiga had worked for over 5 years for Dolores Press when he was terminated. He later filed a lawsuit against the employer alleging unfair business practice because his employment agreement violated the law with respect to calculating his overtime pay. Arechiga argued that since he was a nonexempt employee, the law required his overtime pay to be calculated by dividing his regular hourly rate by 40. He said his salary of $880 per week only compensated him for a 40-hour work week, not his agreed-upon workweek of 66 hours (which included 26 hours of overtime). Therefore, Dolores Press owed him overtime pay for three years.
The employer countered that the law authorized employers to enter into explicit mutual wage agreements with their employees. The trial court ruled in favor of Dolores Press, finding that the explicit mutual wage agreement was valid and that the fixed salary Arechiga received adequately compensated him for both overtime and regular pay. Arechiga appealed.
Unfortunately for Arechiga, the California Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision, finding that Dolores Press had an explicit mutual wage agreement with Arechiga. The law regarding overtime pay for nonexempt employees does not abolish this agreement.
California’s law-making body expressed a concern that the court ruling may allow employers to estimate overtime and include it in a fixed salary. This practice will open the door to workers being required to work additional overtime without being fairly compensated.
In response, California passed a law that addressed the issues in Arechiga. Under this law, the payment of a fixed salary to a nonexempt employee will be considered compensation only for the employee’s regular, non-overtime hours, even though there may be a private agreement to the contrary.
Hence, wage agreements that purport to pay a fixed weekly salary to non-exempt employees to cover the overtime hours worked is illegal.
Wages are a product of negotiations between employers and employees. Employers will generally offer an amount to the employee and the employee may either accept or reject the offer. Employers, anticipating that the employee may work more hours, may create agreements on how the employees will be paid for the extra work.  Some of these agreements include paying the employee a salary per month to cover all the hours that an employee could possibly work, including overtime.
Just because these agreements are signed do not make them legal. With the help of an experienced employment attorney, employees should examine whether the amounts contained in the agreements really pay for all their hours worked.

***

The Law Offices of C. Joe Sayas, Jr. welcomes inquiries about this topic. All inquiries are confidential and at no-cost.  Atty. Sayas’ Law Office is located at 500 N. Brand Blvd. Suite 980, Glendale, CA 91203. You can contact the office at (818) 291-0088 or visit  www.joesayaslaw.com. 

***

C. Joe Sayas, Jr., Esq. is trial attorney who has obtained several million dollar recoveries for his clients against employers and insurance companies. He has been selected as a Super Lawyer by the Los Angeles Magazine, featured in the cover of Los Angeles Daily Journal’s Verdicts and Settlements, and is a member of the Million Dollar-Advocates Forum.

1 Comment
  1. My name is Loveth Andrew currently living in california USA Am writing this letter because am really grateful for what Mrs Lauren Harton did for me and my family when I thought there was no hope she came and make a way for me and my family by lending us loan at a very low interest rate of 2.5%. I never thought that there are still God sent and genuine loan lenders on the web but to my greatest surprise i got my loan without wasting much time so if you are out there looking for a loan of any amount i would like to recommend you to Lauren Harton the Managing director of Lauren Harton Loan Company because she is a God sent woman that can change your life forever, So if you really want to make a better life without any funds scarcity I would advise you to get in touch with her through this e-mail below…[email protected]
    This was how i got my loan from Mrs lauren Harton loan company,Thank you all..

The Filipino-American Community Newspaper. Your News. Your Community. Your Journal. Since 1991.

Copyright © 1991-2024 Asian Journal Media Group.
All Rights Reserved.